It makes sense to ask what the relationship is between a prime (integral) ideal P in some number field K, and a prime integer in Z. For a start, we can look at the intersection of P with Z; it’s straightforwardly a prime ideal, since rules like “ab is in P implies a or b is in P” are true by restriction to Z. It’s also non-zero, since if a in P is nonzero, then N(a) in P and Z is nonzero.

Since the intersection of P with Z is a prime ideal, we can denote it by (p). We then say that P lies over (p). Since (p) is an ideal of K, too, we can look at it as an ideal that’s contained in P, i.e. is divisible by P. So the set of all prime ideals of K that lie over (p) is just the set of all prime ideals of K that occur in the unique factorization of the ideal (p).

For a concrete example, let K = Q(i), O(K) = Z[i]. O(K) is a PID, as I showed ages ago. If p = 1 mod 4, then p = a^2 + b^2 for some integers a and b, so (p) = (a + bi)(a – bi), and we say that p splits; in a more general setting, p splits completely if it factors into ideals that have norm p. If p = 3 mod 4, then N(p) = p^2, so any proper factor will have norm p, which is impossible since it would imply a^2 + b^2 = p; in that case, the ideal (p) is prime so we say p remains prime, or is inert. If p = 2, then (p) = (1 + i)^2 and p is called ramified; in fact (p) = P^n and N(P) = p so P totally ramifies.

At this point it’s not clear what the difference between ramifying and splitting is, but in more advanced parts of number theory, ramification is a fairly pathological thing, which unfortunately happens for at least some primes in a number field (more precisely, p ramifies in K iff p divides the discriminant of K).

To see how prime decomposition is useful, note that if P is any prime ideal of Z[i] then it lies over some p. If p = 3 mod 4, then P = (p); otherwise, P is generated by a single element of norm exactly p. This is nontrivial, because it’s not clear that just like 3 is an irreducible element of Z[i] with composite norm, so could there be an element of the form a + bi where a and b are nonzero that is irreducible but has composite norm.

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Monday, December 4th, 2006 at 11:59 pm and is filed under Mathematics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

That is really interesting, Youre an excessively professional blogger Ive joined your rss feed and sit up for in search of extra of your fantastic post Additionally, Ive shared your website in my social networks!

Its such as you learn my mind! You appear to know so much approximately this, liike
you wrote the e-book in it orr something. I feel that you simply can do with some % to power
the mesage home a bit, however other than that,
this is excellent blog. An excellent read. I’ll
certainly be back.

This is, to a large extent, a free space. I don't delete comments unless they're spam, viruses, impersonations, etc. Shameless blog-whoring doesn't count as spam, because that would just be hypocritical.

That is really interesting, Youre an excessively professional blogger Ive joined your rss feed and sit up for in search of extra of your fantastic post Additionally, Ive shared your website in my social networks!

Its such as you learn my mind! You appear to know so much approximately this, liike

you wrote the e-book in it orr something. I feel that you simply can do with some % to power

the mesage home a bit, however other than that,

this is excellent blog. An excellent read. I’ll

certainly be back.

Very nice post. I absolutely appreciate this website.

Stick with it!