My Take on the Latest Anti-War Bill

I’m not sure whether the Democrats’ latest attempt to remind Bush they won the election will do any good.

House Democratic leaders are developing an anti-war proposal that wouldn’t cut off money for U.S. troops in Iraq but would require President Bush to acknowledge problems with an overburdened military.

(…)

In the Senate, a group of senior Democrats wants to repeal the 2002 measure authorizing the war and write a new resolution restricting the mission and ordering troop withdrawals to begin by this summer. But Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Iraq would have to wait until the Senate finishes work to improve homeland security.

The latter resolution looks like something real, but the idea of requiring Bush to “acknowledge problems” sounds more like noise than like real action. It’s not something totally new to politics; the Republicans are only pro-life on election years, having a federal abortion law more liberal than Roe requires even though they have nearly veto-proof majorities for at least restricting it to what Anthony Kennedy will accept.

The Commissar is a lot less ambivalent than I am. He says, “I propose a nonbinding resolution suggesting that President Bush admit he has been a bad boy, and (per John the Marine) he should be politely requested to write on the blackboard 500 times, ‘I will not invade Middle Eastern countries based on weak intelligence ever again!'”

I still think it’s a buildup for a real bill, but, honestly, it’s more an issue of cowardice now than of political capital. The Democrats have proven that they possess the political capital for real action. Dragging the issue further just to be sure it’s safe makes no sense except when the party is as spineless as a flatworm. The Republicans have been reduced to using shoddy polls to get even small majorities on Iraq; there’s no need to delay action any further.

7 Responses to My Take on the Latest Anti-War Bill

  1. muppt says:

    It was the Mossad giving CIA weak intelligence; the Mossad also gave CIA intelligence on possible terrorist attacks before 9/11.

  2. SLC says:

    Re muppt

    Mr. muppt is a Canadian and apparently a student at the Un. of Toronto. All US readers should ignore him.

  3. Dragging the issue further just to be sure it’s safe makes no sense except when the party is as spineless as a flatworm.

    You insult flatworms with this comparison.

  4. Lynet says:

    You insult flatworms with this comparison.

    Now, now! Pharyngula’s PZ would be the first to tell you that “spineless” isn’t an insult when applied to invertebrates any more than “masculine” would generally be considered insulting when applied to a man.

  5. Alon Levy says:

    SLC, there’s a whole world out there outside US borders.

  6. SLC, there’s a whole world out there outside US borders.

    As long as it’s not restricted to muppt, that is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: