Blog Against Sexism Day: When Objectification Hurts

The story about the law student who was denied employment because a forum for pseudonymous sexists objectified her, discussing her sexually without her knowledge and consent, is making its rounds through the blogosphere. The best take comes from Jill, who documents how the forum’s members cyberstalked her to the point that she had to skip classes for fear of being targeted for harassment or worse.

The objectification in question revolves mostly around a contest run on the forum, “Hottest girls at top 14 law schools.” The contest featured photos of the women, taken by the women or by sex-obsessed forum members; Jill reports how forum members openly talked about masturbating to her picture, photographing her with camera phones, and sexually assaulting her. All of this are beyond objectification; they’re actually hurtful, as the law student who was denied employment will attest.

The first ground rule is that if objectification involves cyberstalking, threatening to rape, or any similar form of harassment, it’s sufficiently wrong that there’s grounds to crack down on it (not to mention illegal). But even when it doesn’t, the power relation involved matters. This very blog features anonymous or pseudonymous commenters who say very unsavory things about politicians and political parties they don’t like. So it’s useful to start exploring the disanalogies between entering Jill into an online beauty contest involuntarily and bashing politicians.

A good standard to apply in many cases is libel law. In the US, there are a lot of exceptions to libel, based on a variety of grounds. It’s always acceptable to say anything about public figures, because they’re assumed to have exposed themselves to valid and invalid criticism, and because they have the power to contradict most statements said about them. If I refer to George W. Bush as a dictator, he can choose to inundate the airwaves with “I am not a dictator because ___” messages; Jill can’t do anything of that sort.

And more importantly, if I refer to George Bush as a dictator, or even to Ann Coulter as a male, then s/he will not be really affected even if my points go unaddressed. Ann Coulter is a public figure whose persona is familiar to many people on her own terms. Even in the unlikely case my slander became the top result on Google, she’s sufficiently public not to be affected. As Elizabeth Edwards noted, when Ann Coulter called John Edwards a faggot she was hurting gays more than she was John Edwards.

In contrast, talking about Jill sexually behind her back has an immediate effect on her, because of the different power situation. She will have to answer to potential employers, who will likely Google her name and find the libelous statements written about her on the forum. The forum is big enough that a thread about her that many people will hold against her through no fault of her own is sixth on Google when one searches for “Jill Filipovic.”

The same goes to the idiots who declared publicly they wanted more pictures of Jill, preferably taken without her knowledge, to masturbate to. Masturbating to a scene involving no person in particular of course doesn’t objectify anyone. Masturbating to a person who consents is not problematic; masturbating to porn falls under consent, since porn stars are assumed to know that the photos or films of them will be used for masturbatory purposes. In contrast, masturbating to someone who doesn’t consent is in the same category as masturbating to the picture of a nine-year-old. It’s not in itself illegal, but once you start discussing it, you should expect people to consider you at best a deviant and at worst a criminal.

I don’t wish to condone vicious attacks on Ann Coulter’s looks or shallow fat jokes about Dick Cheney. But they’re merely idiotic, exposing the shrillness and juvenility of those who make them. Starting a non-consensual beauty contest that gives potential employers the impression the women depicted consented to anything of that sort hurts people by severely defaming their character.

The reaction of the forum’s owners is far from encouraging. In response to a Washington Post article exposing the forum’s misdeeds, the owners thought slander was their right.

Another Yale law student learned a month ago that her photographs were posted in an AutoAdmit chat that included her name and graphic discussion about her breasts. She was also featured in a separate contest site — with links posted on AutoAdmit chats — to select the “hottest” female law student at “Top 14” law schools, which nearly crashed because of heavy traffic. Eventually her photos and comments about her and other contestants were posted on more than a dozen chat threads, many of which were accessible through Google searches.

“I felt completely objectified,” that woman said. It was, she said, “as if they’re stealing part of my character from me.” The woman, a Fulbright scholar who graduated summa cum laude, said she now fears going to the gym because people on the site encouraged classmates to take cellphone pictures of her.

Ciolli persuaded the contest site owner to let him shut down the “Top 14” for privacy concerns, Cohen said. “I think we deserve a golden star for what we did,” Cohen said.

I’m not sure whether admin Jarret Cohen (yes, I’m Googlebombing) was serious when he said that. The phrase “Golden star” is used sarcastically lately, to indicate that someone performed a trivial act but is asking for special dispensations for it, as in, “Bush thinks he deserves a golden star for finally submitting to the law.” What kind of idiot not only thinks he deserves a golden star for not letting his own site be a hornet’s nest of hurtful objectification but also mocks himself by using that specific phrase?

That is sexism, plain and simple. I’m not aware that being female lessens one’s right to privacy. Such contests violate that right in ways that the most vicious attacks on public figures can’t. I realize that there are a lot of people who believe rights only apply to men – hence, pro-life politics – but these are best kept as far away as possible from where they might actually cause damage.

Bean’s Blog Against Sexism Day gender equality checklist specifically calls for shutting down the forum in question. But the problem is not the forum specifically; it’s with a general system that accepts, nay, encourages men to go out and objectify women, preferably in the most hurtful ways possible, on pain of being branded effeminate. The forum is just one nasty example of that general principle, just as lynching was one nasty example of segregation.

19 Responses to Blog Against Sexism Day: When Objectification Hurts

  1. muppt says:

    nice forum! *adds to bookmark*

  2. Nice. As you may have read on my blog, I think that this might be a novel form of sexism, this ability to take so-far private locker-room discussions into the public, and about a private individual who will nevertheless be named while the discussants remain anonymous. There is also an astonishing cowardice in this whole thing.

  3. SLC says:

    Re Ann Coulter

    Since Ms. (Mr.) Coulter engages in scurrilous comments about people she (he) doesn’t like, she (he) has no legitimate complaint against people who similarly insult her (him). Comments that she (he) is a hermaphrodite or is anorexic or about her (him) not needing a bra are no worse then what she (he) dishes out. My philosophy is that if one is going to dish it out, one should be prepared to take it. Aside from which, she (he) is a public figure who appears on cable TV regularly (i.e. Schmuckity and Colmes ) and thus has forfeited her (his) right to privacy. On the other hand, the law student who was slimed by anonymous clowns on a blog was not a public figure and therefore has a right to privacy, and may have grounds for an action against the blog owner. It certainly is apparent that she has been damaged by the slurs on that blog.

  4. […] Abstract Nonsense has a post about some particularly nauseating behavior: “The story about the law student who was denied employment because a forum for pseudonymous sexists objectified her, discussing her sexually without her knowledge and consent, is making its rounds through the blogosphere. The best take comes from Jill, who documents how the forum’s members cyberstalked her to the point that she had to skip classes for fear of being targeted for harassment or worse. […]

  5. Patness says:

    I gotta admit even I’m disgusted by that. Over at /b/ you really grind the bottom of the human coffeepot – but you don’t name the people/animals/whatever and to open that can of worms to the general public to nearly the extent described above is absurd. It’s like the difference between having a discussion in the hallway about how hot a girl is versus putting posters up all over the U with her name and schedule.

    The world is filled with a lot of unsavory people, but perhaps more bothersome, is that the world has an even larger collection of idiots.

  6. Faruq Misid says:

    notebook pda buy notebook today 5113 as5715z 1a1g08mi nout

  7. hotel in nob hill san francisco boutique hotel san francisco union square hotel at downtown disney in orlando hotel casa santo domingo antigua guatemala florence hotel inn inn ky wildwood hotel in cherry hill new jersey hotel in nob hill san francisco oakland marriott hotel and conference center hotel and suite in columbus ohio

  8. audi klub audi centr audi diler diler audi skachat adobe audition 15 audi opisanie audi klub adobe audition 20 skachat tehnicheskaya harakteristika audi

  9. nokiawadd says:

    mobile phone noikia


  10. used sports cars
    Great!Unusual interpretation of the problem, I like this approach.

  11. felice5 says:

    Last time I bought Modalert/Modafinil at Pharmland (ONLINE PHARMACY : Prescription Drugs, Generic Drugs, Health and Beauty.). I prefer this place as I couldn’t afford a prescription from a doctor. They review a medical history and issue prescription for free. levitra buy levitra online
    🙂 online

  12. Steave says:

    Interesting story you got here. It would be great to read more concerning that matter.

  13. Alexander says:

    What’s up?. Thanks for the blog. I’ve been digging around for info, but i think i’m getting lost!. Yahoo lead me here – good for you i guess! Keep up the good work. I will be coming back in a couple of days to see if there is any more info.

  14. Super says:

    I really appreciate your blog post, I always check this once in a while if there is a new one.. thank you very much..

  15. Super says:

    I agree in your post, but there must be an exact explanation on that.

  16. LoveLess says:

    It was extremely interesting for me to read that post. Thanx for it. I like such topics and anything connected to this matter. I definitely want to read more on that blog soon.

    Truly yours

  17. She raced down them, not slowing when she reached ways that were unfamiliar to her. Dirt and grime smeared his skin, and his sleek hair was a knotted, tangled mess. Youre an infuriating man. The information had been followed by a lecture from Irin on how selfish she was. The thought of lashing out at Brevin, Lanthan, or Tykir fizzled as it occurred. His palm smoothed over her forehead, gently smoothing her hair back from her face. Her truemate startled, his wide red eyes blinking as he slowly came to her meaning. She looked to Eyrhaen as Hyle sat up, guarded hope in her eyes. That wouldnt help alleviate her guilt, nor would it open the way to forgiveness. The entire time youve lived among us, Ive been jealous of you. Through a veil of unwanted tears, she glared at the receding door. Brevin sat on the side of the bed, leaning casually on one arm. A gasp puffed past her lips as Lanthan pressed a kiss just underneath her ear. Both Brevin and Tykir burst out laughing. Her breath caught, the tiny, virgin bud of her ass clenching at the thought. She certainly felt the wave of release that pulsed off him. For you, came his hidden thought, I would make time. It wasnt real, you know. And Im hardly one to object, given that Im truemated to another. Even that couldnt prepare her for feeling it firsthand.

  18. Fantastic posting, I favorited your site so I can visit again in the future, Cheers

  19. Avril Kuree says:

    Nice text. When will I get the additional information?

    Avril Kuree
    chantal vip escort warsaw

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: